Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Shampnois's avatar

I suppose it's not that uncanny exactly. Call it a syncrhoincidence. Because Obviously, we're working together in a sense, distantly, but in parallel. Nevertheless, all the various overlaps between the two essays are still somehow a little shocking. I was starting to quote the places that oddly overlapped -- everything from the small surprises (we both mentioned "sky god") to fairly obscure and intricate observations for most people -- calling attention to limits of thought, how the map "lures us into an interior prison." The mention of function as a contrast to the content of thought. Focus on "conflation", how to handle cosmology. I only differed in not saying "thought and creativity are antithetical." I was mainly doing something else here, altering my relationship to thought, so that it can still serve its limited purpose. And you know I also don't feel that political evil is always 50/50. I mean, this is still to me a far worse turn in politics than the usual fascism. The perversions of political thinking never stay perfectly 50/50, bendingr this way and that in overreach. But that's a side issue to this essential synchroincidence, and the fun in reading something so well said, enriched by the idiosyncratic differences that are also there. It's not a copy, it's not the same, it's resonating unusually closely. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Jeff Shampnois's avatar

Uncanny yet again. Tremendous. Weill re-read later more carefully and comment better.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts