Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Shampnois's avatar

An appropriately pessimistic response. You can't be an optimistic cheerleader of a democracy when it's a fraudulent cover for a genocide. I get it. And from that broader and wider perspective you won't have much patience with the reasons why this slide into Trump is the last straw. I still feel that even if is the culmination of business as usual, even if the only difference visible from a wide perspective is the guns turning towards "us" finally and not the distant and invisible usual victims, this still marks an unnecessary turn towards greater psychopathy. The ground level psychology of the gaslighted masses clawing for trump have sold their souls for a dozen eggs and now it's their own corrupted vision that alters the course towards something even worse for all (not just a sharing of the problem). I do think this is something we should have avoided. We don't need this added element, it wasn't necessary to add this self-deceptive license to the mix, which trump lends his victims turned henchmen. We can't pity the gaslighted victims who turn into perpetrators. They have to be brought up short by a realization of their own lost autonomy and hypocrisy in following this piece of shit. But your perspective is not cancelled by this additional insight. Many things that don't need to happen are happening because our focus doesn't swivel rapidly enough to account for everything. But this perspective needed to be added to the pot. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Ben Fuller's avatar

Some what nihilistic, pessimistic...... May I recommend to you the writings of political anthropologist F. G. Bailey. I pulled his 1988 book off the my shelf, Humbuggery and Manipulation, The Art of Leadership, written after Reagan. Just one partial quote" The essentials of political leadership... transcend particular cultures and particular societies. What are these essentials? A summary descriptive answer is malefaction. Everywhere leaders, on the point of failure must break out of the morality they recommend to other people." .... From the blurb on the back.... he shows how reputedly decent leaders as Franklin Roosevelt, Churchill , and even Gandhi used these strategems just as readily as did other less reputable leaders.... On an Orwellian note, I reread Wigan, Paris and Catalonia, and listened to 1984, then did Paul Theoroux seriously well researched novelization of Orwell's time in Burma, Burma Sahib.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts